 |
| Rebel Wilson has secured a significant legal victory after Australia's Federal Court dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by actress Charlotte MacInnes. |
A long-running legal showdown between Hollywood star Rebel Wilson and up-and-coming actor Charlotte MacInnes has reached a decisive climax in the Federal Court of Australia.
Justice Elizabeth Raper dismissed all defamation and breach of confidence claims brought against the Bridesmaids and Pitch Perfect actor, ruling that Wilson did not defame MacInnes across a series of social media posts. MacInnes has also been ordered to pay Wilson's legal costs.
The lawsuit centered around social media updates Wilson published between late 2024 and mid-2025 regarding incidents during the filming of her directorial debut, The Deb.
[ September 2023: Bondi Beach Incident ]
│
▼
[ Complaint & Recantation Disagreement ]
│
▼
[ 2024–2025: Wilson's Social Media Posts ] ───► [ Defamation Lawsuit Filed ]
│
▼
[ Federal Court Dismisses Suit ]
The Origins of the Dispute: A Bondi Beach Bath
 |
| The legal dispute traces back to events that allegedly occurred during the filming of The Deb in Sydney, Australia. |
The clash stems back to September 2023 during the production of The Deb in Sydney, Australia. MacInnes, who landed the lead role in the musical comedy, spent time with the film’s co-producer, Amanda Ghost, at a Bondi Beach apartment.
After swimming in cold water, Ghost experienced a mild reaction, leading both women to share a warm bath while wearing swimwear.
Following the incident, Wilson alleged that MacInnes confided in her as director, stating that the situation made her feel uncomfortable. Wilson later posted on Instagram that MacInnes had "walked back" or retracted her initial complaint after securing a separate lead theater role and a six-figure record deal connected to Ghost.
MacInnes strongly contested Wilson's version of events, filing a multi-pronged defamation suit claiming Wilson’s social media posts framed her as a liar and a sellout who recanted allegations to boost her career.
The Judge's Decision: No Defamatory Meaning or Serious Harm
 |
| The Federal Court ruled that the legal requirements for defamation had not been satisfied under Australian law. |
In her judgment handed down in Sydney, Justice Raper concluded that the statements did not meet the legal threshold for defamation under Australian law.
Failure to Prove Harm: The court found that MacInnes failed to demonstrate that the Instagram posts caused—or were likely to cause—serious harm to her professional reputation or earning capacity.
Contextual Truth: Justice Raper noted that on the balance of probabilities, MacInnes did express discomfort to Wilson shortly after the Bondi Beach incident before later backing away from those statements.
Substantial Truth Defense: The judge ruled that even if one of the posts conveyed that MacInnes had changed her account, Wilson successfully established a defense of substantial truth.
"MacInnes has failed to establish that the publications have caused or were likely to cause serious harm... To say that the circumstances surrounding how they came to be in the bath are unusual would be an understatement."
— Justice Elizabeth Raper, Federal Court of Australia
While the judge acknowledged that all primary witnesses—including Wilson, MacInnes, and Ghost—showed instances of unreliable testimony during the heated hearings, she ultimately cleared Wilson of all liability.
Reactions to the Ruling
 |
Following the ruling, Rebel Wilson welcomed the court's decision, while Charlotte MacInnes' legal team indicated plans to appeal. |
Rebel Wilson, who did not attend the judgment in person, celebrated the outcome on social media, expressing relief that the legal battle had concluded.
"I’m grateful this chapter has reached its conclusion and I’m looking forward to getting back to what I love most, my family and my work. Thank you to the judge and the Australian legal system who I have the utmost respect for."
— Rebel Wilson
Meanwhile, legal representatives for Charlotte MacInnes indicated plans to lodge an appeal against the Federal Court's ruling.
The decision wraps up one major chapter of the ongoing legal conflicts surrounding The Deb, though separate court actions involving producer entities remain active in other jurisdictions.