EC Deputy Chairperson: Judge Elections by Credibility, Not Winners

 

EC Deputy Chairperson: Judge Elections by Credibility, Not Winners

Ghana’s newly appointed Deputy Chairperson of the Electoral Commission (EC), Dr Joseph Kwaku Asamoah, has stated that the Commission’s primary responsibility is to ensure credible electoral processes rather than favouring any political party or candidate to win an election.

Dr Asamoah made the remarks during an interview with Onua TV’s Ekow JB on Onua Maakye on Tuesday, October 13, 2026.

According to him, the Electoral Commission has no preferred candidate or political party, stressing that its central concern is the manner in which election victories are secured.

“We don't have an interest of who wins an election in this country. But our interest is how the elections are won,” he said.

EC Focuses on Electoral Credibility

Dr Asamoah’s comments highlight the distinction between an electoral outcome and the process through which that outcome is achieved.

Under this principle, the Commission’s responsibility is to administer elections in a manner that allows eligible voters to exercise their democratic rights and ensures that votes are properly counted and the results accurately reflect the choices made by voters.

The credibility of an election depends on several factors, including transparent procedures, accurate vote counting, effective supervision at polling stations, proper collation of results and the consistent application of electoral laws.

These processes are essential to building public confidence in elections and ensuring that political parties, candidates and voters have confidence in the administration of the democratic process.

Public Confidence in the Electoral Commission

The Electoral Commission plays a central role in Ghana’s democratic system. Its responsibilities include organising public elections, supervising electoral activities and declaring official results in accordance with the law.

As a result, statements about neutrality and electoral credibility remain important to discussions about the institution’s responsibilities.

For the Commission, maintaining public confidence involves not only following established electoral procedures but also ensuring that its decisions and actions are transparent and can withstand public scrutiny.

Political parties and other stakeholders may disagree over electoral arrangements or results. In such circumstances, transparent procedures and the availability of lawful mechanisms for resolving disputes are important to addressing concerns.

Dr Asamoah’s remarks place emphasis on the process rather than the identity of the eventual winner.

Why the Electoral Process Matters

In a democratic election, the central question is not simply which candidate wins but whether the outcome accurately reflects the votes cast by eligible voters.

A credible electoral process helps ensure that competing political parties have an opportunity to participate under established rules and that voters can exercise their choices without unlawful interference.

Transparency in voter registration, ballot handling, counting and the collation of results can also help reduce disputes and strengthen confidence in the final outcome.

For this reason, electoral credibility is a responsibility that extends beyond election day. It involves preparation, administration, monitoring and the proper handling of complaints throughout the electoral process.

The Commission’s Responsibility

Dr Asamoah’s statement reinforces the importance of distinguishing the Electoral Commission’s institutional responsibilities from the political ambitions of candidates and parties seeking office.

The Commission is expected to administer elections according to the applicable laws and procedures, regardless of which political party ultimately secures victory.

The credibility of that responsibility is reflected in the fairness and transparency of the process, the accuracy of the results and the confidence citizens can place in the administration of elections.

His comments come at a time when public discussion of electoral integrity remains an important part of Ghana’s democratic life.

Ultimately, the Electoral Commission’s role is to oversee the electoral process, while voters determine the outcome through their ballots.

Dr Asamoah’s position, as expressed in the interview, is that the Commission’s interest lies in how election victories are achieved—not in deciding who should win.

JONES NEWS will continue to follow developments concerning Ghana’s Electoral Commission and other issues affecting the country’s democratic institutions.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post